Thanks for your comment. The point you refer to wasn't meant to imply that the policy would promote income inequality (if that's what you meant), but rather that the enduring fact of income inequality is particularly relevant for how we might evaluate a policy that lets parents choose their children's genotype. To the extent wealth might…
Thanks for your comment. The point you refer to wasn't meant to imply that the policy would promote income inequality (if that's what you meant), but rather that the enduring fact of income inequality is particularly relevant for how we might evaluate a policy that lets parents choose their children's genotype. To the extent wealth might end up playing a major role in the kind of "genetically bespoke children" parents can choose, to me it adds a troubling layer to issues of income inequality.
Thanks for your comment. The point you refer to wasn't meant to imply that the policy would promote income inequality (if that's what you meant), but rather that the enduring fact of income inequality is particularly relevant for how we might evaluate a policy that lets parents choose their children's genotype. To the extent wealth might end up playing a major role in the kind of "genetically bespoke children" parents can choose, to me it adds a troubling layer to issues of income inequality.