Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Strong's avatar

I've been leading Socratic conversations in secondary schools for almost forty years, and currently run a Socratic virtual school. Engaging students by asking them about their thoughts on humanistic and moral issues is key to ensuring serious engagement. This sort of move,

"I then ask each student whether they agree with Glaucon. I might respond to what they say, and connect their answers to those of other students: Great answer, Moira, but why do you think you disagree so much with Eva about this? Eva—why are you so much more optimistic about human nature than Moira? And so everyone, even the shyest of students who will never talk otherwise, gets to say something to the class and help shape the discussion."

Is our bread and butter. Insofar as teachers or professors in the humanities or moral psychology envision themselves as the expert transmitting their expertise, it alienates most students from their moral core. We SHOULD be asking students about how they make such decisions, how they think about these things, who they are, what do they stand for, etc.

Respect for the moral agency of the student, respect for moral agency of other human beings, should be a substantial aspect of many courses outside of STEM. Thus it is not only a powerful technique for increasing student engagement in class discussions, it also is a crucial step developing student moral identity, agency,

Rosana S's avatar

Remember it's not about you. Great little piece of advice...

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?